There are no women online.

Anonymous forums are one of the last remaining all-male-spaces where men can speak somewhat freely (a desire for danger!) amongst likeminded brothers (iron sharpens…)

Accommodating women into any male space, brings with them moderation and political correctness of speech (a desire for safety and control).

There was a great quote back in the day of manosphere forums: “there are no women online.”

Meaning that anon chat rooms didn’t care about your feminine attributes (beauty and sexual access), they cared about your masculine attributes: competency or bravery of ideas and experiences.

Ladies get attention just for being in a male space (due to their beauty and/or the possibility of sexual access). Think about women joining the army, or obscure hobby clubs. Their scarcity introduces a dynamic of sexual competition amongst the men.

In the same way that marketers attach smiling bikini models to advertisements of bland products & services, blonde media babes can say the blandest things and get thousands of likes.
Men are signaling for her beauty or sexual availability, not for her ideas or experiences.

Elevating ladies into public leadership and conflict doesn’t just detract from the purpose of the church, but for every domain. Detracting because inviting women into a male space takes the men’s focus off of defeating the enemy, and onto protecting the women.

Leadership is by nature contentious (contending and conflicting with enemies on behalf of your group’s interests).
These ladies are forced into becoming the contentious women that proverbs warns about (and the men are forced into becoming accommodating rather than dangerous).

Our civilization hinges on what expectations we place on our young women.
Do we expect them to be Matriarchs or Martyrs?
Do we ask them to raise families or raze wicked institutions?
They are our only hope for raising wholesome enduring families. Why would we clap as we watch them contend with evil men?

Do not celebrate other men’s wives and daughters getting pushed into masculine roles.
You get the behaviors you incentivize. Young ladies are being cheered into sex-in-the-city career fantasies while being indebted to fleeting men & corporations that will never love them.

“Within the bosom of the woman is a deep desire to be home… [but] as a result of having a nurturing nature, women are good at doing what other people think they should do [instead].” – Lawler, The Summa Domestica

“Women owe over two-thirds of student debt.” – Liz Warren

“But AMY CONEY BARRET is BASED! LAUREN BOEBERT is BASED! CANDACE OWENS is BASED!”
Who raises her children while she contends with wicked men for 80hrs/week?
Who helps her husband while she pursues her mission 80hrs/week?
Which way, Western Woman: enduring family or fleeting career?

Women are a valuable resource, and so churches, universities, and corporations are extractively monopolizing them. Who owns your time, energy, and skill? a fleeting Corporation? or an enduring Family?

“A wife will often have a more extreme but less thought out expression of her husband’s ideology.” – Kiwi Bear

The stressed out feminine: liberal ideology (angst against the created order) creates extreme anxiety.
Opposition to female honor hierarchy (beauty, helpfulness, cheerfulness) = Societal low birth rate.

We are treating our women as men, incentivizing and cheering them away from their motherly nature, and then wondering why they are stressed out and on anti-depressants.